Within The Roswell Report
Do Roswell's Missing Files Point to a Cover Up
Destroyed base files leave a genuine historical gap, but their absence does not show that officials erased evidence of aliens.
On this page
- Which Roswell records were destroyed
- Why the disposal paperwork was incomplete
- What historians can and cannot infer from the gap
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The missing Roswell records remain controversial because they create a genuine gap in the historical record without proving why that gap exists. During a congressional inquiry in the 1990s, investigators discovered that key Roswell Army Air Field (RAAF) administrative files and outgoing message logs covering July 1947 had been destroyed. The surviving paperwork documenting that destruction was itself incomplete, leaving no clear record of who authorised the disposal, when it occurred or under which records-management authority it took place.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govnsiadGovernment Accountability OfficeGovernment Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico |…
For critics of the official explanation, these missing files raise the possibility that important evidence disappeared. For most historians, however, the absence of records is not evidence that they contained proof of an extraterrestrial craft. Instead, it represents an archival problem: missing documentation limits what can be reconstructed about the events of July 1947, but it does not establish what those destroyed records would have shown.
Which Roswell records were destroyed?
The controversy centres on two categories of records that would normally have documented routine activity at Roswell Army Air Field:
- Administrative records covering approximately March 1945 through December 1949.
- Outgoing message files covering approximately October 1946 through December 1949.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govnsiadGovernment Accountability OfficeGovernment Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico |…
These were not files labelled “Roswell UFO” or “flying disc”. Instead, they were routine military records that could have contained orders, correspondence, daily administration and communications relating to the base’s activities during the period that included July 1947.
When the U.S. General Accounting Office (now the Government Accountability Office, or GAO) investigated the matter at the request of Representative Steven Schiff, it found that these collections no longer existed. At the same time, investigators located other contemporary records that had survived, including the July 1947 history prepared by the combined 509th Bomb Group and Roswell Army Air Field, as well as the FBI’s 8 July 1947 teletype describing recovery of an object resembling a balloon with a radar reflector.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govnsiadGovernment Accountability OfficeGovernment Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico |…
The existence of these surviving records demonstrates that the historical archive was incomplete rather than entirely erased.
Why the disposal paperwork became controversial
The missing records attracted particular attention because the documentation explaining their destruction was itself inadequate.
The GAO reported that the available records-disposition form did not identify:
- which organisation or individual destroyed the files;
- when the destruction occurred; or
- under what legal or administrative authority the destruction took place.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govnsiadGovernment Accountability OfficeGovernment Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico |…
Those omissions are significant from an archival perspective because government records are normally destroyed according to approved retention schedules. Without complete disposal documentation, later investigators cannot determine whether the destruction followed routine procedures, reflected poor record-keeping practices or resulted from some other administrative failure.
Importantly, the GAO did not conclude that the records had been deliberately removed to conceal evidence of an alien spacecraft. Instead, it documented an irregularity in the surviving paperwork governing records disposal.
What historians can—and cannot—infer from the gap
The missing files unquestionably reduce historians’ ability to reconstruct exactly what occurred at Roswell during July 1947. Had the administrative files and outgoing messages survived, they might have clarified questions such as:
- internal communications immediately following the debris recovery;
- the sequence of military reporting;
- logistical movements around the base; and
- how information was transmitted to higher headquarters.
Because those records no longer exist, such questions cannot always be answered from primary documentation.
That limitation, however, does not justify treating every later claim as equally probable. Historical method distinguishes between missing evidence and positive evidence. A destroyed archive means some questions cannot be answered conclusively; it does not demonstrate that the destroyed material supported any particular theory.
In practice, historians therefore rely on the surviving documentary record, contemporary newspapers, FBI communications, military histories, witness testimony and later official investigations while recognising that the absence of some base records leaves unavoidable uncertainty.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govnsiadGovernment Accountability OfficeGovernment Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico |…
Why missing records do not automatically imply a cover-up
One of the most persistent misunderstandings is the assumption that destroyed records necessarily indicate intentional concealment.
Several considerations complicate that conclusion.
First, many military records from the mid-twentieth century were routinely destroyed under records-retention policies that were less comprehensive than modern archival standards. Administrative files were often viewed as temporary rather than permanently valuable.
Second, the Air Force informed the GAO that, under regulations in effect during July 1947, there was no requirement to prepare a permanent accident report for the recovery of what officials considered a weather balloon. By contrast, permanent reporting requirements applied to military aircraft accidents, and the GAO identified several such reports from New Mexico during the same month that had been retained.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govnsiadGovernment Accountability OfficeGovernment Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico |…
Third, although the disposal paperwork was incomplete, investigators found no documentary evidence demonstrating that the files had been selectively removed because they contained extraordinary information.
These factors do not eliminate suspicion for every observer, but they explain why mainstream historical scholarship regards the missing records as an unresolved archival issue rather than direct proof of an organised cover-up.
Why the controversy persists
The destroyed Roswell records continue to feature prominently in debates because they leave room for competing interpretations.
Supporters of a cover-up hypothesis argue that missing communications could have documented an event later concealed by the military. Since the original files no longer exist, they contend that the official explanation can never be fully verified.
Historians generally adopt a more cautious position. They acknowledge that the archival gap is real and that incomplete disposal documentation is an unusual and legitimate point of concern. At the same time, they note that historical conclusions must rest on surviving evidence rather than speculation about documents that no longer exist. The surviving 1947 records recovered by investigators do not describe an extraterrestrial craft, and no newly discovered primary document has filled the archival gap with evidence supporting such a claim.[Government Accountability Office]gao.govnsiadGovernment Accountability OfficeGovernment Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico |…
The result is a genuine historical ambiguity. Missing records prevent a perfectly complete reconstruction of events, ensuring that some questions about Roswell will remain unanswered. Yet the existence of that gap, by itself, does not establish that officials destroyed evidence of alien technology. The controversy endures because the absence of records creates uncertainty—but uncertainty is not the same thing as proof.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Do Roswell's Missing Files Point to a Cover Up. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Roswell: Inconvenient Facts and the Will to Believe
For over fifty years an incident near Roswell, New Mexico, has sparked the imaginations of UFO enthusiasts. Did the military recover a cr...
The Roswell Report: Fact Versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert
The Roswell Report: Fact Versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert is the first of two reports discussing the supposed crash landing of an...
UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry
Governments around the world have had to deal with the UFO phenomenon for a good part of a century. How and why they did so is the subjec...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromRoswell poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 95 187
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad
Source snippet
Government Accountability OfficeGovernment Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico |...
2.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/154832
3.
Source: sgp.fas.org
Link:https://sgp.fas.org/othergov/roswell.html
Additional References
4.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Air Force Fact Sheet on UFOs and Project BLUE BOOK * Reference Report re
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
Source snippet
Project BLUE BOOK - [Unidentified]({{ 'unidentified/' | relative_url }}) Flying Objects | National ArchivesJune 25, 2024 — PROJECT BLUE BOOK - UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS * Gene...
Published: June 25, 2024
5.
Source: nsa.gov
Title: General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Steven H
Link:https://www.nsa.gov/Helpful-Links/NSA-FOIA/Declassification-Transparency-Initiatives/FOIA-Reports-and-Releases/FOIA-Reports-and-Releases-List/igphoto/2002761373/
Source snippet
Schiff, House of Representatives - Government Records - Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexic...
6.
Source: govinfo.gov
Title: GAOREPORTS NSIAD 95 187
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GAOREPORTS-NSIAD
Source snippet
GAO/NSIAD-95-187 - Government Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico - GAOREP...
7.
Source: ufotransparency.com
Title: GA O Report to the Honorable Steven H
Link:https://ufotransparency.com/files/1995-07-28-gao-[roswell-report
Source snippet
Schiff, Government Records: Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash Near Roswell, New Mexico (NSIAD-95-187), U.S. Gener...
8.
Source: oocities.org
Title: The GAO Roswell Report
Link:https://oocities.org/area51/corridor/8148/gao.html
Source snippet
July 30, 1995 — Barry Bitzer July 28th, 1995 Schiff Receives, Releases Roswell Report (missing documents leave unanswered questions) Wash...
Published: July 30, 1995
9.
Source: gao.justia.com
Title: GAO Reports Justia GAO Reports
Link:https://gao.justia.com/department-of-defense/1995/7/government-records-nsiad-95-187/
Source snippet
Justia GAO ReportsJustia GAO Reports - NSIAD-95-187 - Government Records - Department of Defense...
10.
Source: scholar.lib.vt.edu
Link:https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/VA-news/ROA-Times/issues/1995/rt9507/950730/07310083.htm
Source snippet
MYSTERY CONTINUESJuly 30, 1995 — Image: ROANOKE TIMES * * * Roanoke Times Copyright (c) 1995, Landmark Communications, Inc. DATE: SUNDAY...
Published: July 30, 1995
11.
Source: af.mil
Link:https://www.af.mil/The-Roswell-Report/quot/
12.
Source: gutenberg.org
Title: The Roswell Report: Case Closed, by James Mc Andrew—A Project Gutenberg e Book
Link:https://gutenberg.org/files/63659/63659-h/63659-h.htm
13.
Source: ufotransparency.com
Title: decade 1990s roswell report fact vs fiction 1994 dtic ada326148
Link:https://ufotransparency.com/files/decade-1990s-roswell-report-fact-vs-fiction-1994-dtic-ada326148